people in motion

people in motion

vendredi 20 juillet 2012

GEOPOLITICAL ANALYSIS


Stratfor's Third Quarter Forecast 2012

There are plenty of forecasts out there, but today  Stratfor, a geopolitical analysis company, has one of the most rigorous methodologies out there, and their forecasts provide excellent insight into the outcome of world events in the coming quarter. 
Europe, Syria, and China are the big three to watch the next three to six months.



Though this may not be a quarter of dramatic changes, three evolving issues will require particularly close scrutiny: the European crisis, the Syrian conflict and China's political struggle. From Brussels to Damascus to Beijing, hard realities are setting in, threatening to dismantle decades long political constructs. Though the biggest cracks in the system will take time to appear, this quarter we will see Europe, Syria and China busily trying to stave off harsh but unavoidable consequences.
In Europe, an ideological attachment to a prosperous past is largely blinding the Continent to the consequences of their crisis. Meeting after meeting will be held to conjure a variety of bureaucratic treatments for the crisis, but the fundamental issue will remain: the weakening of the Franco-German relationship. Whereas the European crisis has been largely characterized to this point by a struggle between the economically stronger core and the deeply troubled periphery, the crisis is now starting to consume the core.
Most of the tensions in the Franco-German relationship will emanate from Paris. France's economic model relies mostly on internal consumption and high government spending. Since the creation of the common currency, France's trade deficit with Germany has increased dramatically. The German approach to the crisis aims to curb government spending, going against France's stimulus-oriented approach. This divergence in interests carries enormous consequences for the fate of the European Union, as the Franco-German axis forms the very foundation of a Continental effort to overcome Europe's eternal geopolitical fault lines.
In Syria, there is a growing acknowledgment that the Alawite core of the regime is holding together while the critical Sunni patronage networks surrounding that core are starting to dissolve. Even as the Alawite core endures, we are coming to a point where inner circle members of the regime, as well as foreign sponsors of the regime in Moscow and Tehran, will seriously begin planning for a post-al Assad Syria. Turkey and its NATO partners still lack the appetite for a foreign military intervention in Syria. However, this environment does raise the potential for a palace coup, in which all stakeholders — Iran and Russia on one side, the United States, Turkey and Saudi Arabia on the other — will m aneuver to fashion an alternative regime that best suits their interests.
In China, the Communist Party leadership is anything but blind to history and so is working to battle the consequences of an economic slowdown coinciding with an upcoming political transition. The case of Bo Xilai was a stark reminder to the Party of the dangers of regionalism when a Mao-inspired populist tries to chart a path toward perceived economic and social stability. This quarter, we will see the Party put the Bo case to rest in a decisive and public show of Party solidarity ahead of a leadership transition later in the year. But this will likely do little to conceal a growing behind-the-scenes debate over China's economic and political direction. Once again, the Party will put off any major decisions on China's biggest challenges in hopes of preventing cracks in the system from widening.
Europe
The European Crisis
The driving issue for the third quarter remains the evolution of the Franco-German relationship. The economic performance of France and Germany will likely continue to diverge more strongly in the coming months. Though the political rise of French Socialist President Francois Hollande has accelerated the inevitable deterioration of the Franco-German relationship, a rupture is not expected this quarter.
The French economy is not yet at a breaking point: French unemployment is lower than the eurozone average and Hollande's government will be able to manage socio-political pressures. France will be under increased pressure to reduce its budget deficit. Hollande's administration plans to address the problem by increasing the taxes paid by France's largest businesses and wealthiest households. While these measures do not address France's systemic economic difficulties, they will allow Paris to skirt a harsher backlash to austerity this quarter.
As the core of Europe weakens, calls for deeper EU integration from both the core and the periphery will grow louder. The peripheral countries will call for more integration to ensure a continued flow of financial assistance, while the more economically stable northern industrial countries will call for additional integration to assert more control over member nations and to protect the common market for their exports. This model of deeper integration overlaying increasingly divergent interests is not sustainable, but it is a model that will endure for the next quarter as the European Union prepares for an October summit on EU integration proposals.
France's push against Germany for stimulus-led — as opposed to austerity-led — measures to manage the crisis will continue to provide countries in the European periphery with more political room to push back on austerity and demand more financial assistance (with negotiable conditionality) from European institutions. German intransigence on austerity will relax as Berlin continues to demonstrate a willingness to accommodate countries needing economic assistance in exchange for deeper integration efforts that provide Berlin with more EU-wide authority.
In Germany, Chancellor Angela Merkel's decisions on managing the crisis at the EU level will come under increased scrutiny from within her coalition and government bodies, particularly from the parliament and the Federal Constitutional Court. Though Germany is facing rising internal pressure, Stratfor does not expect a dramatic shift in the German policy of demanding more fiscal discipline and control before discussing forms of debt mutualization and permanent financial aid.
Spain will complete negotiations for a bailout of its banking sector but is unlikely to receive a sovereign bailout this quarter. The European Union cannot afford to cut Spain off from markets because it does not have the funds to support a Spanish bailout and deal with the contagion to other eurozone countries. Should bond yields for Spain and Italy rise to unsustainable levels as these countries issue new debt this quarter, the eurozone will use the short term financial tools at its disposal — short of a sovereign bailout — to alleviate market pressure.
Greece will not leave the eurozone this quarter. Athens will receive further financial aid, which will allow the country to keep operating. The new Greek government will begin a formal renegotiation of the bailout terms with its lenders, which will keep the Greek crisis at status quo for the third quarter.
One of the main consequences of the continued economic slowdown this quarter will be a decrease in summer employment, particularly in Southern Europe, during the tourist season. Social unrest in the form of protests will be more likely in the tourism-dependent periphery, especially in Greece, Italy and Spain.
Middle East
Ongoing Iranian-U.S. Struggle
Military posturing by both the United States and Iran will again punctuate the third quarter, but both sides will again steer clear of an actual military confrontation. Increased sanctions on Iran will have a limited effect as Iran continues to trade via falsely flagged tankers and shell companies, albeit at higher costs. Iran and the United States will maintain a dialogue behind the scenes in search of a broader accommodation, but Stratfor does not expect any negotiation breakthroughs in the lead-up to the U.S. presidential election. Israel will attempt to pressure the United States into taking more decisive action against Iran but will not risk unilateral action.
The Syrian Battleground
The main battleground between the United States and Iran this quarter will be Syria. The defection of the Tlass family — the Sunni pillar of the predominantly Alawite regime — risks unraveling the regime's Sunni patronage networks in the military and business community.
The Alawites face an existential crisis and will likely band even closer together in the face of a broader Sunni opposition threat. Even so, the psychological impact of high-level defections raises the potential for a Syrian palace coup that would eliminate the al Assads from the regime. Iran and Russia, both of which have deep intelligence links in Syria, will continue providing critical support to the regime to facilitate stronger crackdowns, but these powers will also be maneuvering behind the scenes to produce a non-al Assad alternative that would remain friendly to their interests.
The still-fractured Syrian rebel movement will engage in rounds of diplomacy abroad to build international support but is unlikely to receive much more than it is already getting, namely weapons and money primarily from the Gulf states and Turkey and verbal support and limited intelligence and command-and-control guidance from Western powers. Continued support for both the rebels and the Syrian army from their respective benefactors will result in a steady escalation of violence on both sides. The rebels will remain unable to hold and defend significant territory.
Foreign military intervention in Syria remains unlikely, as neither Turkey nor the rest of NATO is eager to deal with the consequences of military action in another fragile, sectarian regional hot spot. Turkey will maintain a strong military posture along its border with Syria, thereby raising the potential for skirmishes as Syrian forces operate near the border to deny sanctuary to Syrian rebels.
As Syrian-Turkish tensions escalate, Syria and Iran could support Kurdish militant activity in Turkey. If Turkey draws a link between Kurdistan Workers' Party attacks and Syria, Turkish domestic opinion could shift in favor of Turkey taking more decisive action against Syria, though any Turkish action in Syria will be limited without NATO reinforcement.
Turkey Recalibrating
The constraints Turkey faces regarding Syria and other foreign policy matters is motivating Ankara to resolve Turkey's domestic issues. With less attention consumed by Turkey's power struggle and the Kurdish problem, the government hopes to be able to play a more decisive role in foreign affairs. This quarter will thus see continued efforts by Turkey's ruling Justice and Development Party to reach out to its political rivals. However, the Islamist-rooted party's agenda to transform Turkey from a parliamentary to a presidential system and other contentious proposals to reform the constitution will deny the party the consensus it seeks.
The ruling party will make some progress this quarter in its Kurdish containment strategy. Turkey is investing in a pipeline connecting Turkey to energy resources in Iraq's Kurdish north, thereby undermining Baghdad's control over Kurdish export avenues while enhancing Turkey's. Ankara's accelerated moves in Iraqi Kurdistan will fuel tensions between Turkey and the Shiite-dominated government in Iraq. The project, which will be subject to Kurdish militant attacks as it progresses beyond this quarter, will also exacerbate the standoff between Turkey and Iran over the fate of Syria.
Political Accommodation in Egypt
The accommodation between the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces and the Muslim Brotherhood that Stratfor forecast last quarter will hold through to the next quarter. The military will go along with a Muslim Brotherhood presidency and the remainder of the political transition but will ensure its authority through the drafting of the constitution. The Muslim Brotherhood meanwhile will try to focus on building political consensus with a diverse Cabinet. Overall, the political instability that has characterized Egypt for much of the past year will quiet down this quarter. Occasional demonstrations will take place, especially by those left out of the grand bargain between the Muslim Brotherhood and the military, but Stratfor does not expect massive protests or clashes with the military and security forces.
Egypt-Israel relations will continue to experience strain as security in the Sinai Peninsula deteriorates further due to the distraction of the Egyptian military with the political transition and a growing influx of Salafist militants into the region. Amid these security concerns, Hamas will be cautious in how it maneuvers with Israel as the group looks to capitalize on the Muslim Brotherhood's political gains and as the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood begins to engage directly with Israel. Hamas' worsened relationship with Syria will also more visibly orient the organization against the regime and in favor of the Syrian rebellion.
Persistent Instability in Libya
The election of a new government, officially ending the North African country's transition, will not alleviate a deepening rivalry between the hollow authority of the Tripoli-based Libyan central government and the regional city councils (especially Benghazi and Misurata). An overall increase in militant activity in Libya is likely this quarter. We will be closely watching to see if jihadists in Libya shift their campaign from rhetoric to attacks. Given the significance of oil revenues for both the central and regional governments, both will expend efforts to defend Libyan energy infrastructure from tribal and jihadist attacks.
Former Soviet Union
Russia's Domestic Challenge
The Kremlin faces internal challenges in the third quarter as it and various opposition movements prepare for regional and municipal elections in the fourth quarter. The elections will be held under a law that gives non-Kremlin groups a better chance to win gubernatorial and mayoral seats in the regions. For the first time in the past decade, the Kremlin's United Russia party will have to expend considerable effort campaigning in the regions to maintain its hold over the country.
Russia and Its Periphery
Russia will be particularly active in the Baltic states in the third quarter as it tries to rebuild its clout in the energy and security spheres there. The Baltic states will continue initiatives in energy diversification and regional security to distance themselves from Russia. Both Estonia and Lithuania already have implemented provisions under the EU Third Energy Package, which requires natural gas companies to unbundle their sales, transport and production operations, thereby undermining Russia's energy dominance in the region. Meanwhile, Finland is showing more interest in regional security groups like the Nordic Defense Cooperation. Russia may attempt to counter these moves in the third quarter by trying to exploit divisions between Poland and Lithuania and offering economic incentives to countries like Latvia and Finland. But Russia's efforts to reverse these regional initiatives will have limited effect for now.
Russia and the West
Russia's relationship with the West will continue to divide into sour relations with the United States and warmer relations with strategic European partners.
Diplomatic and trade spats will intensify between Russia and the United States in the third quarter. With European powers more concerned with their own affairs, Russia will have more room to maneuver in its efforts to keep the United States focused on the Middle East (and hence away from the Russian periphery) without harming relations with France. Russian backing of Syria through arms sales, sanctions evasion and negotiations will remain a key contentious issue between Moscow and Washington.
A recent energy deal between Russia and Germany will help Russia fortify a long-term relationship with Berlin as these two powers continue to deepen their economic ties. Other Central European states are likely to demand similar deals from Moscow, which will test Russia's ability to maintain its energy leverage in these countries.
Central Asia: Another Dynamic in Strained Relations
Central Asia will remain in a precarious state next quarter with continuing protests in Kazakhstan and the threat of a resurgence of Islamist militancy. Now that Uzbekistan has suspended its membership in the Collective Security Treaty Organization military alliance, Tashkent will be able to entertain alternative security relationships with Washington or Beijing. Russia will seek to build its security ties with Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan in order to contain and maintain pressure on Uzbekistan.
Caucasus: Increasing Security Tensions
The Caucasus region has seen a number of developments in the past few months that will contribute to an increasingly tense security environment in the next quarter. Azerbaijan has significantly increased its security ties with Israel, signing a major defense deal with it this year. Meanwhile, Russia has been emphasizing its security ties with Armenia by signaling its intentions to increase the number of contract troops among its military presence in the country. These trends have increased tensions, spawning border skirmishes between Armenia and Azerbaijan and causing increased psychological operations between Iran and Azerbaijan — raising the potential for instability and miscalculations. Nevertheless, significant constraints will prevent a broader conflict from erupting in the region.
South Asia
U.S.-Pakistan-Taliban Negotiations
A breakthrough in U.S.-Pakistani talks in early July will allow limited movement toward broader U.S.-Pakistani negotiations over a post-NATO Afghanistan. In spite of many key differences between these two uneasy allies, shared fundamental interests are driving the two toward cooperation as the United States prepares its military exit from the region. Numerous obstacles remain, however, which will hamper these negotiations in the coming quarter.
The Afghan Taliban is a major presence in these negotiations. Stratfor expects the Afghan jihadist movement to use its militant arm during the politically sensitive period ahead of the 2012 U.S. presidential election to try to strengthen the Taliban's negotiating position. For its part, the United States will continue its battlefield operations to keep military pressure on the Taliban. And Pakistan will continue to face domestic political constraints this quarter that could undermine the negotiations. A power struggle between the government and the judiciary could pave the way for e arly elections before the end of the year. The broader negotiations among the United States, Pakistan and the Taliban will continue but are unlikely to see much progress this quarter.
India's Economic Reality and Foreign Policy Concerns
The slump in Indian economic growth in the last quarter of the fiscal year of 2011-12 was unavoidable. It reveals underlying stresses on the economy and served as a wake-up call for New Delhi. The Indian government cannot engage in any meaningful short-term economic measures to offset the slowdown, especially since slashing interest rates further would risk exacerbating already rising inflation. Indian policymakers will try more superficial moves that highlight the government's economic expertise in an effort to maintain the perception that Indian economic growth remains on an upward trend. Though India will remain a significant economy, the government's efforts will not hide the fact that exuberance over India's economic prospects is waning.
On the foreign policy front, India will maintain a cautious approach toward efforts in improving Indian-Pakistani ties. New Delhi will steer clear of major commitments or concessions toward Islamabad as it keeps a nervous watch on progressing U.S.-Pakistani negotiations.
East Asia
China's Economic, Political and Social Challenges
In the third quarter, the Chinese leadership will juggle three interrelated issues: Continued economic problems triggered by the global slowdown and lingering European uncertainty; social pressures arising from these economic problems; and the need to build consensus and rebuild legitimacy for the Communist Party of China ahead of the generational leadership transition through the fourth quarter of 2012 and the first quarter of 2013.
On the economic front, mounting fears of a sharp slowdown mean Beijing will continue to prioritize higher growth. Beijing will continue to push infrastructure projects, reflecting the need to use domestic investment to sustain economic activity. Large state-owned enterprises will see their profits continue to fall in the third quarter, and imbalances in commodity markets may further depress state enterprises producing steel, coal and other core materials. Activity in the real estate sector, meanwhile, will pick up, particularly amid revenue difficulties for local and provincial governments and following the latest interest rate cut. Beijing may choose to ignore rising real estate prices despite an official policy of slowing sales.
Labor protests and public protests over various infrastructure projects and social and economic grievances may bring stronger local and central government responses this quarter. Beijing will seek to maintain social stability as it manages political balances amid the final preparation for the leadership transition.
Beijing will also wrap up the Bo Xilai case in the third quarter, seeking a decisive end to domestic and international speculation over the unity of the Communist Party. The sentences for Bo and his wife will likely be harsh to signal decisiveness and confidence. Behind the scenes, however, the Party will be engaged in intense debates as Beijing seeks a cautious balance between competing economic policies and the stability of the political transition, particularly with a series of key personnel appointments to be settled in the third quarter to pave the way for the transition. In general, this means the government will not be afraid to implement short-term solutions to maintain stability, once again delaying any action on the Party's major challenges.
Rising Maritime Tensions
Regionally, the third quarter will see greater attention paid to maritime territorial disputes, raising the potential for inadvertent clashes. In mid-July, the Philippines will lift a ban on fishing in disputed waters. China will follow suit in August, leading to a rush of competing fishing vessels to parts of the South China Sea disputed by the two, followed by their respective coast guards, maritime police and navies. Competition over energy resources will also spur rhetorical, and potentially physical, confrontations. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations will seek an understanding with China on a binding code of conduct for the South China Sea ahead of the group's fourth quarter summit. The Philippines continues to try to draw the United States and others into the discussions, something China strongly opposes, so Beijing may be more inclined to work through ASEAN as opposed to China's preferred bilateral path to reduce the likelihood of U.S. involvement.
The Rise of the Japanese Regionalists
The expulsion of dozens of members of the ruling Democratic Party of Japan amid attempts to pass new tax legislation is likely going to bring an end to Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda's government and necessitate a call for new elections in the third or fourth quarter. Although yet another government turnover is not very unusual for Japan, the election will be a bellwether for determining the status of the country's emerging regionalist parties, which could begin to challenge the political and bureaucratic status quo over the next few years if they can gain momentum.
Latin America
Building Strain on Mercosur
Trade and political tensions will continue to rise within Mercosur as Brazil and Argentina pursue protectionist policies both within Mercosur and on the international market. These measures have had a detrimental impact on the smaller Mercosur members, Paraguay and Uruguay, whose relationships with larger neighbors Brazil and Argentina will come under further strain in the third quarter. Paraguay's political isolation from Mercosur after former President Fernando Lugo's rapid impeachment will add more tension to the bloc, but Paraguay is not in a position to completely withdraw without significant bilateral economic guarantees. Uruguay will push for trade opportunities outside Mercosur to offset the effects of intrabloc protectionism. Despite increasing disunity, the Brazil-Argentina relationship at the core of Mercosur will endure as both rely on the agreement to manage bilateral economic concerns and their strategic geopolitical rivalry.
Pre-Election Tensions in Venezuela
During the third quarter, attention in Venezuela will focus on the lead-up to the Oct. 7 presidential election. Despite more than a year of conflicting rumors about Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez's health, the Venezuelan leader appears poised to stand for re-election Oct. 7. The election season is shaping up to be a relatively straightforward contest between Chavez and his chief rival, Miranda state Gov. Henrique Capriles Radonski, with Chavez likely enjoying more support. As with any Venezuelan election, there will be occasional bursts of violence between members of opposing political factions, bombastic political discourse and large-scale government spending and purchase announcements made by the Chavez administration to win support of key factions such as the military, petroleum sector workers and the urban poor.
Argentina's Search for Financing
Argentina will spend the third quarter seeking investment in oil and natural gas production in an attempt to reverse a growing energy deficit. To do so, the government will continue to use domestic pools of capital — such as private bank and Central Bank reserves — and both the central government and provincial governments will court international investment. Argentina will not fully settle its outstanding international debts in the third quarter due to restrictions on the government's ability to meet key international demands. These include revising its inflation reporting methodology, a process that would rapidly increase Argentina's national debt. Tight budgets at the national and provincial levels will drive further rent-seeking, and the mining sector will see increased pressure to increase revenue shares and investments from provincial governments similar to the pressure initially experienced by YPF ahead of its nationalization.
Mexico's Political Transition and Ongoing Violence
Mexico's politics will be in transition as President-elect Enrique Pena Nieto builds his government, tries to redevelop Institutional Revolutionary Party patronage networks and seeks backing from rival factions on issues like energy investment, tax reform and managing the drug cartels when he enters office in December.
Mexico's security situation will remain turbulent. The Sinaloa Federation and Los Zetas and their respective allies will continue to fight for territorial control in the northeast (particularly in Tamaulipas and Nuevo Leon states), while the Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion will maintain its ongoing turf wars in the central and Pacific states (particularly Guerrero and Michoacan) against the Knights Templar. Los Zetas and the Cartel Pacifico Sur will continue operations against the Sinaloa Federation in Jalisco (including the state's capital, Guadalajara) and Sinaloa states.
Sub-Saharan Africa
Somalia's Battle Against al Shabaab
A pro-Somali government offensive led by African Union peacekeepers to flush al Shabaab from its remaining urban strongholds will intensify in the third quarter. A Kenyan-led military siege on Kismayo will occur around August while other African Union peacekeepers continue a ste ady buildup in Mogadishu. Al Shabaab reprisal attacks against soft targets in Kenya can be expected. Meanwhile, Ethiopia will maintain blocking positions in central and southwestern Somalia. U.S. financial rewards for information on the location of high-value al Shabaab leaders may facilitate the multipronged offensive. Rains that traditionally fall from September to December could hamper the intervention but will not derail it. Al Shabaab fighters will retreat to their clans in the hinterlands where they can regroup. They will not be neutralized by the end of the quarter.
Somalia will hold elections for a new federal government. On Aug. 20, it will select a new president, ending Somalia's transitional government era. With limited financial resources and no established institutional support, the new government faces tremendous challenges in reversing popular support for warlords and militancy by establishing good governance out of a deeply corrupt system. The new government will try to make slow and incremental improvements to government efficiency and service delivery while taking advantage of enhanced security from the African Union Mission in Somalia and other allied military forces.
Nigeria's Struggle with Boko Haram
The Nigerian government will continue operations against Boko Haram in the northeastern region of the country. Military and security forces will receive training and small equipment upgrades. Government and civil society leaders will attempt to split the movement through back-channel negotiations. Though these efforts will disrupt Boko Haram, they will not significantly undermine the group. Political opposition to President Goodluck Jonathan's administration will provide space in northern Nigeria for Boko Haram to operate. Clashes between government forces and Boko Haram militants and low-intensity militant attacks can thus be expected to continue in the third quarter.
Strained Negotiations Between Sudan and South Sudan
Sporadic clashes between Sudan and South Sudan will persist in the third quarter as both sides attempt to redraw the boundaries of the oil-rich borderland through military force. Military clashes will be interlaced with strained negotiations, but a decisive military or political breakthrough is unlikely. Compared to last quarter, Sudan's military offensive against South Sudan may be more tempered in the coming months as both sides confront growing political, military and economic constraints. With neither Sudan nor South Sudan in a position to shift the conflict decisively, external assistance, particularly from China and Japan, will remain limited as foreign players maintain a wait-and-see approach to the negotiations.
Economic austerity measures enacted by both Khartoum and Juba last quarter will weaken popular support for both governments. Demonstrations will persist in Sudan, but will not pose a significant threat to the regime. The austerity conditions may compel energy negotiations between Khartoum and Juba in an effort to revive oil revenue streams, but the two governments will remain focused on developing separate spheres of investment and oil development.
Islamist Militant Containment in Mali
With backing from the Economic Community of West African States, politicians in Mali will be focused on regaining political legitimacy this quarter as civilian and military authorities in Bamako engage in power-sharing negotiations to form a new national unity government. The political distractions will prevent effective coordination or deployment of resources from the capital to counter Islamist militant gains in the northern half of the country.
Militant activity will largely be contained to northern Mali this quarter due to the fractured nature of the Tuareg rebels and their common interest with al Qaeda forces to protect smuggling routes from outside intervention.
The Economic Community of West African States will engage in military operations in Mali, but these will remain limited without Western support. Contingency plans for a West African-led foreign intervention are under discussion, but Stratfor does not expect the plans to become operational so long as militant activity is contained in northern Mali. Western powers with counterterrorism interests in the region, primarily the United States and France, will rely instead on unilateral special operations forces' strikes against al Qaeda forces in the region to contain the transnational jihadist threat.

Is Gold Manipulated ?


LIBOR Manipulation Leads To Questions 

Regarding Gold Manipulation


The ‘Liebor’ scandal is the latest scandal to befall Wall Street and City of London banks and official regulators and central banks.

The Libor fixing scandal is amusing as everybody- all the talking heads and ‘experts’ are “shocked,  shocked”  to  discover that this benchmark interest rate underlying trillions of dollars worth of financial transactions worldwide was being manipulated

This is despite more astute analysts such as Gillian Tett and others warning that rigging was taking place and LIBOR was a fiction as far back as in 2007.


A lack of transparency, a lack of enforcement of law and a compliant media which failed to ask the hard questions and do basic investigative journalism led to the price fixing continuing and the manipulation continuing unchecked on such a wide scale for so long - until it was exposed recently.

Similarly, the gold market has the appearance of a market that is a victim of “financial repression”.

Given the degree of risk in the world – it is arguable that gold prices should have surged in recent months and should be at much higher levels today.

The gold market has all the hallmarks of Libor manipulation but as usual all evidence is ignored until official sources acknowlege the truth.

However, like LIBOR the gold manipulation 'conspiracy theory' is likely to soon become conspiracy fact.

It will then – belatedly - become accepted wisdom among 'experts.'  Experts who had never acknowledged it, failed to research and comment on it or had simply dismissed it as a “goldbug accusation.”
Financial repression means that most markets are manipulated today - especially bond and foreign exchange markets.
Many astute analysts are asking today (see Commentary) - why would the gold market be completely immune to such intervention and manipulation?
The last thing insolvent banks and governments want is a surging gold price.
Perverted and ‘unfree’ markets create profound risks financial systems and economies and for all investors and savers. They also present opportunities.
As ever, it is prudent to be on opposite side of official manipulation as ultimately the free market forces of supply and demand will always win out.
Smart money internationally remains short fiat currencies and long gold.

Gold price manipulation detailed in latest Thunder Road Report

Paul Mylchreest claims to show absolute proof of massive gold price manipulation (suppression) in a detailed analysis of price patterns in his latest Thunder Road Report. His arguments are compelling.
Paul Mylchreest's irregularly produced Thunder Road Report always makes for fascinating reading on matters metals and mining and the latest of these - sent out yesterday - is no exception with a detailed analysis of what Mylchreest sees as ever continuing big money, technically illegal, and large scale, manipulation of the gold market.  A position U.S. pressure group GATA has also taken for many years and the GATA work and findings are also well covered in the report with much implied praise for the group's work on this subject.
Mylchreest backs up his arguments with a succession of Kitco daily gold price charts which show, in his view - and his arguments are compelling - that there are some obvious  market sale algorithms in place which kick in virtually every time the gold price starts accelerating upwards - and that these interventions happen at precise times on a regular basis - the most notable of which is at 8 am London time and 3 am New York time - all designed to colour the trading pattern of gold on the principal world gold markets, and also designed to convince putative gold investors that the precious metal is not necessarily the safe haven it is cracked up to be.
Mylchreest's report runs to 56 pages and a full copy of it is available  below


see also :
http://www.letemps.ch/Page/Uuid/628033fc-cea4-11e1-870a-d199398163a7/Prix_de_lor_les_grandes_manœuvres
and our other articles on The Libor Scandal

Prix de l’or: les grandes manœuvres
PAR FRANÇOIS GILLIÉRON*
Prix de l’or: les grandes manœuvres Le scandale qui vient d’éclabousser la Barclays Bank à propos de la manipulation du taux interbancaire, le fameux Libor, est instructif à plus d’un titre
Le scandale qui vient d’éclabousser la Barclays Bank à propos de la manipulation du taux interbancaire, le fameux Libor, est instructif à plus d’un titre. D’abord, parce que les grandes affaires de corruption annoncent souvent des fins de règne, ce qui laisse à penser que la mise à pied du tout-puissant patron de cette banque en annonce d’autres. Mais, aussi, parce que toute cette affaire prenait sa source à l’occasion d’un fixing. Comprenez un accord car­tellaire, par définition opaque. Or, pour les financiers, la notion de fixing est d’abord rattachée au métal jaune, dont le prix est ainsi arrêté quotidiennement à Londres.
D’ici à penser que le prix de l’or a fait l’objet de nombreux «arrangements», il n’y a qu’un pas, dont les médias parlent ces jours-ci. Des traders connus détiennent en effet d’énormes positions dites «short» qui visent à faire baisser les prix. Plus largement, le métal jaune a de nombreux détracteurs. Pour ne pas dire de puissants ennemis, à commencer par les banquiers centraux qui ne veulent surtout pas lui reconnaître son statut de monnaie refuge. Ces derniers savent, en effet, que la hausse du prix de l’or coïncide souvent avec une gestion laxiste de la masse monétaire dont ils sont justement responsables.
Quant aux banquiers, leur relation à l’or est ambiguë. Officiellement, ils vantent les mérites de diversification d’un tel actif et recommandent les actions minières ainsi que des achats dits «en compte-métal». Dans ce dernier cas, les banques les plus prudentes détiennent dans leurs coffres les quantités correspondantes pour être en mesure, en cas de situation exceptionnelle, d’allouer à chaque client la quotité physique qui lui revient.
Mais, le plus souvent, la part de l’or détenue par les banques sous forme de lingots ou de pièces est faible par rapport aux encours des comptes métaux, sans parler des produits structurés détenus dans leurs livres et qui totalisent des chiffres immenses. Si une crise importante devait survenir, l’émetteur ou la contrepartie de ces derniers risque fort de se retrouver aux abonnés absents.
C’est dans cette logique qu’il convient de poser une question encore incongrue: verrons-nous bientôt apparaître une divergence notoire entre le prix de l’or physique et celui de l’or-papier? Officiellement, non. Mais la mémoire collective de l’Occident a oublié les grandes spoliations du passé, et rares sont les Américains qui se souviennent qu’un de leurs présidents, peu soucieux de protéger la propriété privée, avait simplement déclaré illégale en 1933 la détention d’or par les particuliers. La manipulation de l’or, monnaie ultime, reste plus que jamais à l’ordre du jour.
* Consultant indépendant


Le Temps

lundi 9 juillet 2012

Into the Matrix

Into the Matrix



The Matrix is a colorfully insightful mosaic of more than 5,000 historical investment periods over the past century. It presents the returns and more for every starting year and ending year since 1900.

The most powerful aspect of the Matrix is its ability to highlight the pockets of above-average and below-average returns for investors with decades-long horizons, while also demonstrating the calm, long-term average available only to investors with century-long horizons. When Bull's Eye Investing was published, the early signs of a secular bear were just appearing on the edge of the chart. With the Matrix now updated with nine more years of results, it's becoming clear that this may be one of the worst periods of stock market returns.
For perspective, here's a small image of the version of the Matrix that was included in the book  at http://www.crestmontresearch.com/stock-matrix-options/.
The chart presented below, which you may select to link to the original 47KB PDF document, provides nominal rates of return for the S&P 500 index (including full reinvestment of dividends) for each full calendar year period from the beginning of 1900 through the end of 2011 *See explanations below

All in all, a very effective way of presenting 105 years worth of stock market performance data, including what rate of return could have been obtained on an investment made at the beginning of a calendar year for any given holding period of interest. But, that's not all - the folks at Crestmont Research have provided more data than they realize! 
If you follow the diagonals in the chart, which run from the upper left to the lower right, you can see what the S&P 500 rates of return are for given holding periods. If you follow the left-most diagonal, you will have 105 points of data showing what the S&P has historically returned for a one-year holding period. If you follow the black diagonal line on the chart, you can quickly see the 20-year long rates of return for the S&P 500. And if you take this pattern to the extreme, at the upper right corner of the chart, you will have one point of data showing the S&P 500 rate of return for the 105 year investment holding period!
First, don't try to read the numbers in the image below. Instead, treat it like a Magic Eye chart. Just look at the color pattern. You will note that the pockets of reds and greens along the center horizon reflect high- and low-return periods. In Bull's Eye Investing, the lower right-hand corner of the chart included only the first two columns of red. The addition of nine more columns makes it clear that this is a significant secular bear. Given current valuations and expected future returns, we're likely to see a lot more red columns before the secular bear ends. 

The observations from Bull's Eye Investing remain true today.

Quoting from the book by: Bull's Eye Investing by Ed Easterlink and John Maudlin
As we consider the story that the matrix begins to tell, several observations are initially apparent. There are clear patterns of returns relating to the secular bull and secular bear cycles. The periods of red and pink alternate with periods of blue and green. Once the new period starts, it tends to persist for long periods of time. Though the very long-term returns have been positive and near average, investment horizons of 10 years, 20 years, and even longer aren't long enough to ensure positive or acceptable returns.
Note also that we've recently completed the longest run of green years in the past century. Though we've had a couple of down (red) years lately, it has hardly helped to restore the long-term average to "average." We have quite a distance to go to complete what the mathematicians refer to as "regressing to the mean." As you look back over the past 100 years, there has never been a period where "the "red bear" stopped after a few short years and morphed into a "green bull."
Secondly, when you look at the "Taxpayer Nominal" chart, you will notice that the returns tend to be in the 5 to 7 percent range [only!] after long [again, repeat the word long several times] periods of time. Often nominal returns are 5 percent or less over multiple decades. Again, the charts clearly show the most important thing you can do to positively affect your long term returns is to begin investing in times of low P/E ratios.

Conclusion, a serious cyclical bear market 

Chapter six concluded with a summary section titled "What Does It Mean?" It was definitive. We did not pull our punches and did not hesitate to be specific about the environment in front of us. Low returns, slow growth, and declining P/Es – they have all happened, but they are not over.
The current P/E for the stock market is near the level where all previous secular bears started. Since the inflation rate did not diverge far from price stability over the past nine years, we made only minor progress on the P/E path toward lower levels. We have clearly been in secular-bear waters, nonetheless. This also means that our expectation of a "decade or more" of secular bear conditions was not overstated.  We concluded:
  • For the past two chapters, we've considered statistical, cyclical, and fundamental reasons that stock market returns are likely to be less than average over the next decade or more. However, a sharper near-term retreat could hasten the next cycle. The confluence of factors that produced the historic secular bull market of the 1980s and 1990s is now positioned to leave few options for consistent near-term returns.
  • What we are saying is that P/E ratios are going lower–potentially much lower than current ratios. This can happen by either the market moving sideways for a long period of time as earnings growth catches up or a drop in prices to where P/E ratios are consistent with a secular bear market cycle bottom.
  • If inflation returns and interest rates rise, P/E ratios will trend downward. If deflation takes hold and economic malaise results, P/E ratios will also tend downward. Even if inflation and interest rates remain low and stable, the growth rate in the economy and earnings is likely to be below average, as we remain in the Muddle Through Economy for an extended period of time. This would mean that the market could move sideways for a considerable period of time waiting for earnings to catch up.
  • In each of these instances, especially given the existing high P/E ratio of the stock market, returns from equities can be expected to be below average or negative for many years. This is consistent with the bull and bear secular market analysis detailed in the previous chapter. As well, the environment will be volatile and choppy, consistent with the profile of secular bear markets.

Sadly, the period of low or no returns is not likely to be over soon. P/E has a long way to decline before the end of this secular bear. We can get to the lower P/E ratios that typify the end of a secular bear market and the beginning of a secular bull market by either going sideways (with lots of volatility) for a long time, while earnings continue to rise, or we can see a serious collapse of the price of stocks in a short cyclical bear market. While we suspect the former is more likely, given the various crises afoot in the world and a US government that has the potential to not respond correctly, a serious cyclical bear market cannot be ruled out.
Either way, the next few years or perhaps the entire next decade will be frustrating for investors, as the market continues its rollercoaster ride to nowhere. And given the correlation between US markets and world markets, the coming period is likely to be frustrating in more places than just the US. But savvy investors with diversified and well-developed portfolios will not only ride out the storm, they are likely to achieve investment success. There will be winning stocks and strategies in even the worst bear markets. An emphasis on absolute returns and alternative investment portfolios will be rewarded. Hang on and prepare for interesting times.
* Let's take a moment to explain the layout of the chart. There are three columns of numbers down the left-hand side of the chart and three rows of numbers across the top of the chart. The column and row closest to the main chart reflect every year from 1900 through 2002. The column on the left side serves as our start year and the row on the top represents the ending year. The top row has been abbreviated to the last two numbers of the year, due to space constraints. Therefore, if you want to know the annual compounded return from 1950 to 1973, look for the row with the year 1950 on the left and look for the intersecting column labeled "73" (for 1973). The result on the version titled "Taxpayer Nominal" is 8, reflecting an annual compounded return of 8 percent over that 23-year period. Looking out another nine years, the return for 32 years drops to 6 percent after tax. (Note: Crestmont revised the Matrix to include lower transaction costs after 1975; thus, the updated Matrix reflects a 7-percent return for the 32 years). If we were to use "Taxpayer Real" for the same period, returns would drop to 2 percent. Also, there is a thin black diagonal line going from top right to lower left. This line shows you what the returns are 20 years after an initial investment. This will help you see what returns have been over the "long run" of 20 years.
Also note: the return number for the above example appears in a cell that is shaded light green. The color of the cell represents the level of the return. If the annual return is less than 0 percent, the cell is shaded red. When the return is between 0 percent and 3 percent, the shading is pink. Blue is used for the range 3 percent to 7 percent, light green when the returns are between 7 percent and 10 percent, and dark green for annual returns in excess of 10 percent. This enables us to look at the big picture. While long-term returns tend to be shaded blue, shorter-term periods use all of the colors.
Additionally, some of the numbers are presented in white, while others are black. If the P/E ratio for the ending year is higher than the P/E for the starting year – that is, if the P/E ratio was rising – the number is black. For falling P/E ratios, the color is white. In general, red and pink return cells most often have white numbers, and the greens and blues have black numbers. The P/E ratio for each year is presented along the left side and along the top of the chart.
This theme of rising and falling P/E ratios and the corresponding rise and fall of the stock market is one we are going to return to again and again. If you can understand this dynamic, you will be far ahead of most investors in the race to a comfortable retirement.
Finally, there is additional data included on the chart. On the left side of the chart, note the middle column of numbers. And across the top of the chart note the middle row. Both series represent the index values for each year. They are used to calculate the compounded return from the start year to the end year. Along the bottom of the chart, Crestmont included the index value, dividend yield, inflation (Consumer Price Index), real GDP, nominal GDP, and the 10-year annual compounded average for both GDP measures. For the index value, keep in mind that the S&P 500 Index value for each year represents the average across all trading days of the year.
Down the right side, there's an arbitrary list of developments for each of the past 103 years. In compiling the list of historical milestones, it was quite interesting to reflect upon the past century and recall that the gurus of the 1990s actually believed that we were in a "new economy" era. Looking at the historical events, it could be argued that almost every period had reason to be called a "new economy." But that's an argument for another day.

Market commentary

‘Dancing around the Fire of Hell.’ 

Byron Wien's close encounter. 


For years I’ve been telling you that the accumulation of debt was going to be the ending of the developed world and for years you have been telling me my views are too extreme. The problem is you are an optimist and I am a realist. You go around with a smile on your face thinking that there are serious problems facing us, but that everything will turn out favorably because the policy makers will do what they have to do to avoid disaster, and so far you have been right. The developed economies and their stock markets have plodded along and investors haven’t made or lost much money in spite of the challenges. At a certain point, however, the temporary measures that the policy makers put in place to avoid financial catastrophe prove insufficient and that’s where we are now. I’m not saying that it will happen tomorrow but events are falling into place that will take the smile off your face.




The Smartest Man is a Firedancer


When the New Democracy party in Greece defeated the anti-bailout Syriza, I was anxious to learn what The Smartest Man in Europe thought of it all.  The next day I flew across the Atlantic to meet him and we had a long discussion about the world financial outlook.  


Many of you remember The Smartest Man from earlier essays; I have been writing about him annually for more than a decade.  He has been a friend for thirty years, and during that period he has shown an almost uncanny ability to see major events affecting the financial markets before other observers.  Among these were the fall of Japan as an economic power in the 1980s, the economic changes in China and their significance the early 1990s, and the serious consequences of excessive borrowing in the developed world in the last decade.


His DNA endowed him with a certain amount of business acumen.  His ancestors operated canteens along the Silk Road, selling food, weather protection and supplies to travelers to India and China.  He apprenticed in finance in New York, but returned to Europe to take advantage of opportunities created during the post-war recovery there.  Along the way he has acquired the ABC’s of European wealth – an airplane, a Bentley and a house on a Cap in the French Riviera.  The depth and breadth of his art collection is impressive, but material things are not what gives him a high.  He gets his thrills from identifying a problem, thinking it through and being right in determining how it gets resolved. In his ninth decade, he is an inspiration to me.


He started out by saying he had done some preparation for our visit.  “I think the title of your essay should be ‘Dancing around the Fire of Hell.’  For years I’ve been telling you that the accumulation of debt was going to be the ending of the developed world and for years you have been telling me my views are too extreme.  The problem is you are an optimist and I am a realist.  You go around with a smile on your face thinking that there are serious problems facing us, but that everything will turn out favorably because the policy makers will do what they have to do to avoid disaster, and so far you have been right.  


The developed economies and their stock markets have plodded along and investors haven’t made or lost much money in spite of the challenges.  At a certain point, however, the temporary measures that the policy makers put in place to avoid financial catastrophe prove insufficient and that’s where we are now.  I’m not saying that it will happen tomorrow but events are falling into place that will take the 
smile off your face.


“The problem is that most investors think incrementally.  They don’t step back and look at the whole landscape, which includes how we got here and where we might end up.  In democracies the people always want the government to do more for them, but they don’t want to pay higher taxes.  Politicians get elected by promising benefits, not by raising the revenues necessary to avoid increasing debt.  In a developed economy real growth should equal the population increase plus productivity.  


For Europe and the United States that’s about 2%, but people there want their economies to grow more than that so the government provides the stimulus to create faster growth and takes on the debt necessary to do it.  Everything is fine as long as the cost of ten-year debt doesn’t exceed the nominal growth rate, but when it does the cost of servicing the debt becomes an unsustainable burden, and that’s where Spain and Italy are.  The United States isn’t quite there yet.
“When governments finally get around to recognizing they are in trouble, what do they do?  They accept the fact that they cannot produce more growth by providing fiscal stimulus because that would only increase the debt problem, and they can’t take the risk of a recession that might clean out the legacy debt obligations because that would prevent future borrowing, so they do the only thing they can do: they print money.  


That’s what the Federal Reserve did in 2008 when they increased the Fed balance sheet from $1 trillion, virtually all in the U.S. Treasurys, to $2.5 trillion, with the increase mostly in mortgage-backed securities.  That’s what the European Central Bank (ECB) did in 2011 when the sovereign debt problems of the weaker countries became severe.  The balance sheet of the ECB increased from €2.0 trillion to €3.0 trillion, and the increase was mostly made up of the sovereign debt of the weaker 
countries.


“This may go on for a while, but it can’t go on forever.  In Europe’s case Germany will stop backing the monetary expansion and the U.S. Fed will get uneasy as well.  As Milton Friedman persistently argued, inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon.  So far, however, inflation has remained tame because house prices and wages haven’t risen in most places in Europe and the United States (except real estate in London and New York, where foreign capital has flowed in).  At some point, however, inflation will become a factor.


“Right now we’re witnessing a kind of convergence.  The standard of living in the developed world is declining and the standard of living in the developing world is increasing.  Debt to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ratios in the developed world are about 100%, where, as Ken Rogoff and Carmen Reinhart have pointed out in This Time Is Different, growth becomes modest.  In the developing world debt to GDP is only about 35%, so these countries have a long way to go.


“When you think about it, there are a lot more people producing things these days than there were thirty years ago.  Up until 1980 the United States was a major manufacturer and accounted for the dominant share of world GDP, about twice as much as it does now.  By 1980 Europe was producing goods for export and Japan was selling cars, cameras and consumer electronics to everyone.  Now China is the second largest economy in the world and is a major manufacturer, having come from nowhere in the 1970s.  With so many places producing so much and some doing it at relatively low cost, is it any wonder that a lot of people in higher labor cost areas like Europe and the United States are out of work?  The U.S. today is primarily a service economy with a trade deficit.  Germany is a manufacturing economy with a trade surplus.  Do you have to ask why one is doing well and the other isn’t?


“Going back to the Greek election, I think it will prove to be a non-event.  Antonis Samaras will agree to adhere to the austerity program the previous government signed in March in exchange for financial relief, but it will be hard for him to deliver as required.  The Greek people won’t tolerate the pain they will be forced to endure.  They are hot-blooded and want to see results quickly.  There are only two ways to solve the problems of the weaker countries:  austerity, which would mean a 10% contraction in GDP (and Greece is already doing worse than that) or default, which is the route that Russia and Argentina took to get back on track.  Ireland is a good example of a country that successfully took the austerity route.


“Before we experience widespread defaults the authorities will pull out every trick in the book to prevent catastrophe.  That’s because there is a general belief that the European Union was a good idea.  In order to compete against the United States and Asia, the European countries had to hang together.  It was as much a geopolitical decision as an economic one.  There needs to be more cooperation among the European leaders.  The first step is to create a coordinated banking system to prevent a run on the banks.  Deposit insurance won’t do the job.  It’s too much to expect the various governments to agree to a political union at this time, but there could be a banking union to prevent the European banking system from collapsing. 


“The next step will be for every central bank in the world to keep printing money.  Ultimately this will bring on a higher level of inflation, but I think the world is ready to accept that.  World leaders will agree that growth should be their objective and inflation will be the price they will have to pay for it.  This may result in some instability among currencies.  Before this happens there will have to be more suffering.  Spain and Greece will default.  There won’t be outright financial disaster because by the time the defaults take place the banks will have sold most of the troubled sovereign debt on their balance sheets to the European Central Bank.  France’s deficit will get worse as Hollande implements some of the programs he talked about in his campaign.  Human beings and governments have an unlimited imagination and they will use it to delay the day of reckoning.  In the longer term the crisis may turn out to be a good thing because the pain of what we are about to go through 
will prevent it from ever happening again.


“In the short term interest rates should keep rising because debt is increasing faster than GDP.  This should be true in the United States also, but capital is moving there for perceived safety reasons.  After the defaults occur, there will be slow growth.  The defaults will ultimately create a banking crisis, and that will result in a World Economic Conference where the leaders will agree on an objective of 7% nominal growth made up of the 2% real growth and 5% inflation.


“The Federal Reserve has to keep printing money to prevent a recession.  Europe is already in a recession and the ECB will keep printing money, but the Fed may be more aggressive and that could weaken the dollar further.  What we are experiencing is an accumulation of bad decisions.  The worldwide banking system was able to work together effectively to deal with the financial crisis of 2008 but hasn’t done so well since then.  The banks need more capital.  Their loans are being written down.  Their government bond holdings are declining in value.  On top of this, Basel III is imposing additional capital requirements.  How does that make sense?  It’s impossible.  I don’t know whether a default or an economic conference comes first, but in democracies, a crisis usually causes a conference.  In the meantime, capital in Europe will continue to flee to Germany, Finland and the Netherlands.




“So what am I doing with my money?  It is hard to hide in stocks.  Even Danone is reporting disappointing earnings; people are so worried they aren’t even buying yogurt.  The French auto companies are in trouble.  I think gold is going much higher.  I am buying energy stocks because I want to own something real.  Preserving capital is my focus now, not making money, but I like IBM and Apple.  Also some Swiss multi-nationals.  If Obama wins in November the market will go down.  A Romney victory will create a rally, but once he gets into office he will find there is not much he can do to make things better.


I left The Smartest Man’s office somewhat dazed.  My optimism was clearly diminished by what he had to say, but I still believe that somehow disaster has a way of usually not happening.  It seems clear that world leaders are going to do everything possible to avert a financial catastrophe and I think they have the resources to accomplish that goal.  It does seem, however, that the developed world has to resign itself to a prolonged period of slow growth.


*     *     *     *     *
Byron Wien, Vice Chairman, Blackstone Advisory Partners.